|
BugTraq
A technique to mitigate cookie-stealing XSS attacks Nov 05 2002 06:44PM Michael Howard (mikehow microsoft com) (3 replies) Re: A technique to mitigate cookie-stealing XSS attacks Nov 11 2002 06:19PM Jeremiah Grossman (jeremiah whitehatsec com) (1 replies) RE: A technique to mitigate cookie-stealing XSS attacks Nov 12 2002 12:46AM Jason Coombs (jasonc science org) Re: A technique to mitigate cookie-stealing XSS attacks Nov 07 2002 08:26PM Justin King (justin othius com) (1 replies) Re: A technique to mitigate cookie-stealing XSS attacks Nov 05 2002 09:38PM Florian Weimer (Weimer CERT Uni-Stuttgart DE) (2 replies) Re: A technique to mitigate cookie-stealing XSS attacks Nov 08 2002 04:23AM daw mozart cs berkeley edu (David Wagner) Re: A technique to mitigate cookie-stealing XSS attacks Nov 06 2002 05:16AM Valdis Kletnieks vt edu (1 replies) Re: A technique to mitigate cookie-stealing XSS attacks Nov 08 2002 10:12AM Florian Weimer (Weimer CERT Uni-Stuttgart DE) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> I would be very interested in major browsers supporting a <dead> tag with an
> optional parameter to be a hash of the data between the opening and closing
> dead tag. This tag would indicate that no "live" elements of HTML be
> supported (e.g., JavaScript, VBScript, embed, object).
I'm not sure if that's the best solution. Lots of code out there do much
less filtering than it should, so there will probably be a way to include
a </dead> tag and then use all the usual XSS tricks.
// Ulf Harnhammar
VSU Security
ulfh (at) update.uu (dot) se [email concealed]
[ reply ]