BugTraq
Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 05:08AM
David Litchfield (david ngssoftware com) (7 replies)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 05 2003 01:41PM
dullien gmx de (1 replies)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 10:52PM
David Litchfield (david ngssoftware com) (2 replies)
Re[2]: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 05 2003 05:02PM
dullien gmx de
RE: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 09:47PM
Jason Coombs (jasonc science org)
RE: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 06:54PM
Riley Hassell (rhassell eeye com)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 02:00PM
sd hysteria sk (1 replies)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 11:20PM
David Litchfield (david ngssoftware com)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 02:00PM
Torbjörn Hovmark (torbjorn hovmark abtrusion com)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 11:38AM
Charlie Root (weedpower home ro) (4 replies)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 06 2003 01:00AM
Deus, Attonbitus (Thor HammerofGod com)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 05 2003 09:49PM
Alun Jones (alun texis com)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 08:08PM
Brian Hatch (bugtraq ifokr org) (2 replies)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 09:38PM
David S Goldberg (dsg mitre org)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 05:26PM
Alan DeKok (aland freeradius org) (2 replies)
Re: Can't Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 05 2003 10:06AM
bugtraq gaza halo nu (2 replies)
Re[2]: Can't Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 06 2003 07:14PM
dullien gmx de
Observation on randomization/rebiasing... Feb 05 2003 09:10PM
Nicholas Weaver (nweaver CS berkeley edu) (1 replies)
RE: Observation on randomization/rebiasing... Feb 05 2003 10:07PM
Jason Coombs (jasonc science org)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 05 2003 01:48AM
Crispin Cowan (crispin wirex com)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 06:38PM
David Litchfield (david ngssoftware com) (1 replies)
Re: [VulnDiscuss] Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 05 2003 05:32PM
Halvar Flake (halvar gmx net)
Re: Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 04 2003 11:34AM
Eugene Tsyrklevich (eugene securityarchitects com)
Re: [VulnDiscuss] Preventing exploitation with rebasing Feb 03 2003 09:49PM
Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf coredump cx)
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, David Litchfield wrote:

> Use addresses such as 0x**000000 or 0x00**0000 for the new image base.
> With there being a NULL in much of the image's address space this will
> help. (This of course won't make a difference with unicode overflows)

Just FYI, both techniques are somewhat old in the *nix world. NUL in the
address is, among others, implemented by the Openwall kernel patch on
Linux, and PaX randomizes stack and executable base mapping addresses.

--
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2003-02-03 13:45 --

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus