BugTraq
RE: Disclosure-for-pay? Jul 21 2003 01:49PM
Martin Walker (martin walker ctg com) (1 replies)
RE: Disclosure-for-pay? Jul 21 2003 02:50PM
Jay D. Dyson (jdyson treachery net)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Martin Walker wrote:

> NOTE: that the individual is not saying "Pay me or I'll tell everyone
> about it". He's just saying "Pay me or I WON'T tell you about it".
> There is a subtle but critical difference. Your example is incorrect
> from that standpoint.

Perhaps, but I doubt someone would go to all that trouble just to
get stiffed in the end...and NOT tell everyone else if they don't get
their way. People of that caliber don't typically function like that.

> Personally I don't think it is very good business, but it is not as
> damning as many people are screaming about. In fact, the most unethical
> part is the "provide future services at no cost".

I've seen people get hauled in on extortion charges for making
similar "disclosure requests."

- -Jay

( ( _______
)) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee."-. >====<--.
C|~~|C|~~| (>------ Jay D. Dyson - jdyson (at) treachery (dot) net [email concealed] ------<) | = |-'
`--' `--' `- If war isn't the answer, what's the question? -' `------'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (TreacherOS)
Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys.

iD8DBQE/G/3BNlg1oZSC9mkRAugxAJ9/s8IVPew4/UGYoYWo6OlG2DcLkQCfeScA
EpH2krMCI0pJqgDgaL7jUOM=
=q319
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus