On 01.08 19:47, Vijay Jagdale wrote:
> Have we had enough methods yet? Check another embarrassingly easy way:
>
> <script>for (i in document.all.tags);</SCRIPT>
do you mean
<script>for (i in document.all.tags);</SCRIPT>
or exactly that one you wrote? my msie 6.0.2800.1106 crashed on the second.
--
Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, uhlar (at) fantomas (dot) sk [email concealed] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I don't wish to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: Nezelam si na tuto adresu dostavat akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way.
> Have we had enough methods yet? Check another embarrassingly easy way:
>
> <script>for (i in document.all.tags);</SCRIPT>
do you mean
<script>for (i in document.all.tags);</SCRIPT>
or exactly that one you wrote? my msie 6.0.2800.1106 crashed on the second.
--
Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, uhlar (at) fantomas (dot) sk [email concealed] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I don't wish to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: Nezelam si na tuto adresu dostavat akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way.
[ reply ]