I believe that Mr. Raadt meant PAX by W^X.
We all enjoy ascii art but I wanted to note that renaming somebody
elses work is not so ethical.
so for the real thing please consider checking:
http://pageexec.virtualave.net/
my linux box have 0 remotely exploitable vulnerabilities in its default
install since the begining of time and space. thanks to segmentation, ASLR
from the PAX project.
Thanks,
- noir
-----Original Message-----
From: Theo de Raadt [mailto:deraadt (at) cvs.openbsd (dot) org [email concealed]]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:37 PM
To: Mariusz Woloszyn
Subject: Re: Buffer overflow prevention
> I believe the best protection (at this time) is to combine ProPolice
> with a W^X technology.
I believe that Mr. Raadt meant PAX by W^X.
We all enjoy ascii art but I wanted to note that renaming somebody
elses work is not so ethical.
so for the real thing please consider checking:
http://pageexec.virtualave.net/
my linux box have 0 remotely exploitable vulnerabilities in its default
install since the begining of time and space. thanks to segmentation, ASLR
from the PAX project.
Thanks,
- noir
-----Original Message-----
From: Theo de Raadt [mailto:deraadt (at) cvs.openbsd (dot) org [email concealed]]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:37 PM
To: Mariusz Woloszyn
Subject: Re: Buffer overflow prevention
> I believe the best protection (at this time) is to combine ProPolice
> with a W^X technology.
[ reply ]