|
BugTraq
Popular Net anonymity service back-doored Aug 21 2003 04:56AM Thomas C. Greene (thomas greene theregister co uk) (4 replies) Re: Popular Net anonymity service back-doored Aug 21 2003 06:38PM Florian Weimer (fw deneb enyo de) (1 replies) Re: Popular Net anonymity service back-doored Aug 21 2003 12:05PM Thomas C. Greene (thomas greene theregister co uk) (3 replies) Re: Popular Net anonymity service back-doored Aug 21 2003 10:30PM Alex Russell (alex netWindows org) Re: Popular Net anonymity service back-doored Aug 21 2003 04:42PM Andreas Kuntzagk (andreas kuntzagk mdc-berlin de) (1 replies) RE: Popular Net anonymity service back-doored Aug 21 2003 08:16PM Drew Copley (dcopley eeye com) (1 replies) Re: Popular Net anonymity service back-doored Aug 21 2003 10:35PM Richard Stevens (mail richardstevens de) |
|
Privacy Statement |
Mailing-List: contact bugtraq-help (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]; run by ezmlm
From: "Thomas C. Greene " <thomas.greene (at) theregister.co (dot) uk [email concealed]>
Organization: The Register
Leaving a hint in the source and waiting for someone to call them on it may be
a legal strategem, but it's not a good way of maintaining user
trust.
Only a fool would blindly depend on someone else's software to gain
anonymity without examining the code. If you need anonymity, then you
should easily be willing to invest sweat equity, or have a contractual
arrangement when the threat is only financial. For more serious
threats requiring anonymity, not reviewing the source when it is
available seems beyond stupid. I could unserstand your ire if you
were one of our clients, but this was a free service wasn't it?
FAR
[ reply ]