> Enabling a world-wide auto-update feature does indeed seem much of a
> security risk to me.
There was an interesting article in the Washington Post recently:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A34978-2003Aug23?language=print
er
It included the text:
The chance of a patch wrecking Windows is dwarfed by the
odds that an unpatched PC will get hit. And for those
saying they don't trust Microsoft to fix their systems,
I have one question: If you don't trust this company,
why did you give it your money?
I like that last question, even if (or perhaps "especially since" {8^) I
bring it to a different conclusion than others may.
> Enabling a world-wide auto-update feature does indeed seem much of a
> security risk to me.
There was an interesting article in the Washington Post recently:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A34978-2003Aug23?language=print
er
It included the text:
The chance of a patch wrecking Windows is dwarfed by the
odds that an unpatched PC will get hit. And for those
saying they don't trust Microsoft to fix their systems,
I have one question: If you don't trust this company,
why did you give it your money?
I like that last question, even if (or perhaps "especially since" {8^) I
bring it to a different conclusion than others may.
- Andrew
[ reply ]