BugTraq
Re: Re[2]: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Sep 08 2003 07:11PM
psz maths usyd edu au (Paul Szabo) (1 replies)
3APA3A <3APA3A (at) SECURITY.NNOV (dot) RU [email concealed]> wrote:

>>> -R 0 -s your_ad_can_be_here
>
>> Your cure is worse than the disease: rate limiting allows a DoS
>> against the service, no limit allows a DoS against the whole
>> machine.
>
> -s limits number of processes invoked from same IP. You can additionally
> use -c to prevent distributed attack. It doesn't allow to DoS box and
> doesn't disable service for 10 minutes.

Note that my (DEC/Compaq/HP Tru64) inetd does not have -c or -s options.
The only safe way is to use a sensible -R and tcp_wrappers. Or upgrade to
Linux and xinetd...

Cheers,

Paul Szabo - psz (at) maths.usyd.edu (dot) au [email concealed] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au:8000/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney 2006 Australia

[ reply ]
Re[4]: 11 years of inetd default insecurity? Sep 08 2003 07:56PM
3APA3A (3APA3A security nnov ru)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus