|
BugTraq
Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service Sep 23 2003 09:04PM Richard M. Smith (rms computerbytesman com) (2 replies) Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 06:00PM Mark Coleman (markc uniontown com) (3 replies) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 07:45PM der Mouse (mouse Rodents Montreal QC CA) (1 replies) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 08:58PM Jay D. Dyson (jdyson treachery net) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 07:26PM Hugo van der Kooij (hvdkooij vanderkooij org) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 07:00PM Marco Ivaldi (raptor 0xdeadbeef info) (2 replies) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 25 2003 09:37AM Henning Rust (Henning Rust stud uni-hannover de) (1 replies) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 25 2003 03:21PM Niels Bakker (niels=bugtraq bakker net) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 08:05PM Diego Bitencourt Contezini (diego redesul net) |
|
Privacy Statement |
I just discovered that VeriSign's SiteFinder Web site is leaking data
submitted in Web forms to its marketing analysis partner, Omniture.
Forms can easily contain personal information such as an email address.
For the problem to occur, a Web form must use the GET method.
This data spill problem occurs if a Web page anywhere on the Internet
submits a Web form to an action URL with a misspelled or expired domain
name. Because of VeriSign's recent controversial changes to the DNS
system, this form data is submitted to the SiteFinder Web site.
SiteFinder in turn passes the form data along to Omniture in the URL of
a Web bug. The Web bug is constructed on the fly by about 50 lines of
JavaScript code embedded in the SiteFinder home page.
This data spill problem raises legal questions because of possible
violations of the VeriSign privacy policy and of the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act (ECPA).
As a point of comparison, it appears that Microsoft went out of their
way to not receive form data with their Smart Search feature. In my
experiments, Smart Search is not enabled for Web form action URLs with
misspelled or expired domain names. Instead, Internet Explorer gives a
generic 404 error page.
Here's an example form that illustrates the problem:
<form action="http://www.atypodomainthatismisdirectedbyverisign.com
/cgi-bin/subscribe.pl" method=get>
<input type=hidden name=list value=horsebreeding>
<input type=text name=email>
<input type=submit value="Subscribe">
</form>
And here's what the URL of Omniture Web bug looks like with an email
address from the form in it:
http://verisignwildcard.112.2o7.net/b/ss/verisignwildcard/1/G.2-Verisign
-S/s07262928512095?[AQB]&ndh=1&t=23/8/2003%2016%3A6%3A20%202%20240&pageN
ame=Landing%20Page&ch=landing&server=US%20East&c1=www.atypodomainthatism
isdirectedbyverisign.com/cgi-bin/subscribe.pl%3Flist%3Dhorsebreeding%26a
mp%3Bemail%3D&c2=www.atypodomainthatismisdirectedbyverisign.com/cgi-bin/
subscribe.pl%3Flist%3Dhorsebreeding%26amp%3Bemail%3D%20%2800/00%29&c3=ww
w.atypodomainthatismisdirectedbyverisign.com/cgi-bin/subscribe.pl%3Flist
%3Dhorsebreeding%26amp%3Bemail%3D%20%28DYM%29&c12=No&c13=00&c14=No&c15=0
0&c16=Yes&c17=15&c22=NOT%26%2332%3BSET&g=http%3A//sitefinder.verisign.co
m/lpc%3Furl%3Dwww.atypodomainthatismisdirectedbyverisign.com/cgi-bin/sub
scribe.pl%253flist%253Dhorsebreeding%2526email%253D%26host%3Dwww.atypodo
mainthatismisdirectedbyverisign.com&s=1024x768&c=32&j=1.3&v=Y&k=Y&bw=101
6&bh=530&ct=lan&hp=N&[AQE].
Some relevant links are:
Data spills in banner ads
http://www.computerbytesman.com/privacy/banads.htm
SiteFinder privacy policy
http://sitefinder.verisign.com/privacy.jsp
Omniture privacy policy
http://www.omniture.com/policy.html
Omniture company overview
http://www.omniture.com/company.html
Electronic Communications Privacy Act
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/pIch119.html
Court draws a line for online privacy
http://news.com.com/2100-1029-1001081.html
Richard M. Smith
http://www.ComputerBytesMan.com
[ reply ]