|
BugTraq
base64 Sep 22 2003 12:49PM "Ilya Teterin" (alienhard mail ru) (5 replies) Re: base64 Sep 23 2003 04:50PM Alexander Ogol (sanyok_nospam prophysoft org ua) (1 replies) Re: base64 Sep 23 2003 04:18PM Birl (sbirl temple edu) (1 replies) Re: base64 Sep 23 2003 06:10PM Lothar Kimmeringer (bugtraq kimmeringer de) (2 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> the tiny fraction of users with broken software suffer when their
> mails get rejected.
> (Note: this of course applies not only to Base64 but to all aspects
> of header-parsing, file-format guessing etc...)
I agree with you that such errors should produce rejections.
But there's an awful lot of otherwise legitimate mail software out
there that commits (and more that accepts and passes along) rudimentary
errors like
- One-digit hour, minute, or second values
- Invalid timezone strings ("Pacific Standard Time", "CEST", "JST", etc)
- Completely missing timezones
- Non-encoded high-half characters in header text
(From: "François" <fxm (at) example (dot) net [email concealed]>)
- High-half characters in mail implicitly marked charset=US-ASCII
- Non-8859 characters (0x80-0x9f) in mail marked charset=iso-8859-1
- Retrying messages that have been 5xx-rejected
Indeed, I recently discovered I had been auto-unsubbed from this very
list for, as near as I can tell, rejecting mail exhibiting some of
those syntax errors.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse (at) rodents.montreal.qc (dot) ca [email concealed]
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
[ reply ]