|
BugTraq
Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service Sep 23 2003 09:04PM Richard M. Smith (rms computerbytesman com) (2 replies) Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 06:00PM Mark Coleman (markc uniontown com) (3 replies) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 07:45PM der Mouse (mouse Rodents Montreal QC CA) (1 replies) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 08:58PM Jay D. Dyson (jdyson treachery net) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 07:00PM Marco Ivaldi (raptor 0xdeadbeef info) (2 replies) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 25 2003 09:37AM Henning Rust (Henning Rust stud uni-hannover de) (1 replies) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 25 2003 03:21PM Niels Bakker (niels=bugtraq bakker net) Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Sep 24 2003 08:05PM Diego Bitencourt Contezini (diego redesul net) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> More naughty Verisign deeds...
....
> This means that they can easily harvest the SOURCE email address field
> for marketing purposes (no typos there), and would have a strong
> educated guess of the correct domain of the mistyped TARGET.
Unfortunatly I found paper mail getting to me with an address that was
only used by a Veri$ign company and the address in this format was not
available through the WHOIS records. They sold my data without my consent.
That was the moment I decided to go to another register with my domain
info. So I think ill intend is not just suspected but must be considered
to be a real fact of life with Veri$ign
I for one have removed the Veri$ign root certificates and will inform
sites relying on them about the risk they take with Veri$ign and do advise
others to take smilar actions so we hurt them through their wallet.
Hugo.
--
All email sent to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage.
hvdkooij (at) vanderkooij (dot) org [email concealed] http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
for they are subtle and quick to anger.
[ reply ]