BugTraq
Re: base64 Sep 25 2003 01:06PM
MightyE (trash mightye org) (1 replies)
Re: base64 Sep 25 2003 03:30PM
Bennett Todd (bet rahul net) (3 replies)
Re: base64 Sep 25 2003 11:46PM
Earl Hood (earl earlhood com) (2 replies)
Re[2]: base64 Sep 26 2003 06:02PM
3APA3A (3APA3A SECURITY NNOV RU)
Re: base64 Sep 26 2003 05:08PM
Bennett Todd (bet rahul net)
RE: base64 Sep 25 2003 08:20PM
Alun Jones (alun texis com) (1 replies)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bennett Todd [mailto:bet (at) rahul (dot) net [email concealed]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:30 AM
>
> Do all this canonicalization before the message hits your
> attachment type policy enforcement and malware scanner, so they only
> have to deal with the common forms that everybody handles the same.

With the obvious disadvantage that we're all reduced to using the
lowest-common-subset of functionality. Never mind inventing or supporting
new features, or adding international file naming support, in your new email
client, because the mail server will strip all of that out, anyway. I don't
think that's an appropriate answer.

Alun.
~~~~
--
Texas Imperial Software | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email
1602 Harvest Moon Place | alun (at) texis (dot) com. [email concealed]
Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers.
Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.

[ reply ]
Re: base64 Sep 26 2003 06:11PM
Bennett Todd (bet rahul net)
Re: base64 Sep 25 2003 06:21PM
MightyE (trash mightye org)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus