BugTraq
Re: base64 Sep 25 2003 01:06PM
MightyE (trash mightye org) (1 replies)
Re: base64 Sep 25 2003 03:30PM
Bennett Todd (bet rahul net) (3 replies)
Re: base64 Sep 25 2003 11:46PM
Earl Hood (earl earlhood com) (2 replies)
Re[2]: base64 Sep 26 2003 06:02PM
3APA3A (3APA3A SECURITY NNOV RU)
Dear Earl Hood,

Signature is applied to decoded message. If encoding is broken there is
no need to try to keep signature. Reassembling message is really best
solution. But there are another ways to bypass message reassembling.
Some of them can be found in

http://www.security.nnov.ru/advisories/content.asp

--Friday, September 26, 2003, 3:46:36 AM, you wrote to bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]:

>> limits. Recode base64. Recode uuencoded chunks. Regularize
>> non-standard MIME.

EH> You cannot do this for signed messages, therefore, you still
EH> need to either decode in all possible ways or drop the message
EH> (or the offending entity).

EH> --ewh

--
~/ZARAZA
Èáî ôàêòû åñòü ôàêòû, è èçëîæåíû îíè ëèøü äëÿ òîãî, ÷òîáû èõ ïîíÿëè è â íèõ ïîâåðèëè. (Òâåí)

[ reply ]
Re: base64 Sep 26 2003 05:08PM
Bennett Todd (bet rahul net)
RE: base64 Sep 25 2003 08:20PM
Alun Jones (alun texis com) (1 replies)
Re: base64 Sep 26 2003 06:11PM
Bennett Todd (bet rahul net)
Re: base64 Sep 25 2003 06:21PM
MightyE (trash mightye org)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus