SecurityFocus

Re: Unhackable network really unhackable? Nov 26 2003 11:34PM
Julian Wynne (bugjules anarkey org) (2 replies)

Re: Unhackable network really unhackable? Nov 28 2003 10:10AM
Crispin Cowan (crispin immunix com) (2 replies)

Re: Unhackable network really unhackable? Nov 29 2003 03:19PM
Thor (thor hammerofgod com)

Re: Unhackable network really unhackable? Nov 28 2003 11:22PM
Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org)

Re: Unhackable network really unhackable? Nov 27 2003 09:45PM
Niels Bakker (niels-bugtraq bakker net)

* bugjules (at) anarkey (dot) org [email concealed] (Julian Wynne) [Thu 27 Nov 2003, 19:14 CET]:
[..]
> Furthermore we would like to point out that InvisiLAN technology has no
> relation whatsoever with DHCP, for example InvisiLAN changes randomly
> not just the IP address but also the MAC address and the port numbers.

That rules out long-living TCP sessions. Kind of defeats the purpose of
having a machine connected, doesn't it?

-- Niels.

--
[Please reply to niels=bugtraq (at) bakker (dot) net [email concealed] instead. I'm sick and tired
of all the morons who misconfigure their mailers and send autoreplies
back after anybody contributes something to a mailing list.]

[ reply ]