|
BugTraq
Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 22 2004 05:25PM Richard M. Smith (rms computerbytesman com) (2 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 23 2004 03:29AM ~Kevin Davis³ (computerguy cfl rr com) (3 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 23 2004 07:58PM Kirk Spencer (kspencer ngrl org) (1 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 23 2004 06:48PM Daniel Capo tco net br (2 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 29 2004 04:09PM Mariusz Woloszyn (emsi ipartners pl) (3 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Feb 03 2004 02:56PM Christian Vogel (chris obelix hedonism cx) (2 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Feb 03 2004 04:13PM Daniel Capo tco net br (1 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Feb 04 2004 04:39PM Thomas M. Payerle (payerle physics umd edu) Re: [security] Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Feb 03 2004 04:02AM rsh idirect com (1 replies) Re: [security] Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Feb 03 2004 10:08PM Bernie, CTA (cta hcsin net) (1 replies) RE: [security] Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Feb 05 2004 11:41AM Larry Seltzer (larry larryseltzer com) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 24 2004 07:11PM Dinesh Nair (dinesh alphaque com) (1 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/01/22/infiltration_of_fi
les_
> seen_as_extensive?mode=PF
>
> Infiltration of files seen as extensive
> Senate panel's GOP staff pried on Democrats
> By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff, 1/22/2004
>
> WASHINGTON -- Republican staff members of the US Senate Judiciary Commitee
> infiltrated opposition computer files for a year, monitoring secret strategy
> memos and periodically passing on copies to the media, Senate officials told
> The Globe.
>
[snip]
You left off the most important fact in your snip. The final paragraph
pretty well sums it up:
"A technician hired by the new judiciary chairman, Patrick Leahy,
Democrat of Vermont, apparently made a mistake that allowed anyone to
access newly created accounts on a Judiciary Committee server shared by
both parties -- even though the accounts were supposed to restrict
access only to those with the right password."
I sure wouldn't call this a major hack attack. Someone goofed. Someone
else took advantage of the goof (and according to some reports even
reported it to the bonehead technician).
One one hand you really shouldn't look at someone else's files. On the
other hand if you're cooking up dirty tricks you darn well ought to make
sure your memos are protected, not stored in the clear on a shared
system.
And these are the jokers who want to dictate to us how to secure the
Internet and stop SPAM? Heh!
Brian
---[Office 71.6F]--[Fridge 38.4F]---[Fozzy 88.8F]--[Coaster 71.7F]---
Linux Software Developer http://www.brianlane.com
[ reply ]