|
BugTraq
Hijacking Apache 2 via mod_perl Jan 21 2004 10:53PM Steve Grubb (linux_4ever yahoo com) (2 replies) Re: Hijacking Apache 2 via mod_perl Jan 22 2004 03:53PM Ben Laurie (ben algroup co uk) (1 replies) Re[2]: Hijacking Apache 2 via mod_perl Jan 22 2004 05:37PM 3APA3A (3APA3A SECURITY NNOV RU) (3 replies) Re: Hijacking Apache 2 via mod_perl Jan 22 2004 05:42PM André Malo (nd perlig de) (1 replies) Re: Hijacking Apache 2 via mod_perl Jan 22 2004 06:04PM Steve G (linux_4ever yahoo com) (2 replies) Re: Hijacking Apache 2 via mod_perl Jan 23 2004 09:39PM Matthew Wakeling (mnw21-bugtraq jumpleads com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
>>Then one just writes a perl extension in C. Who's responsible
>>then?
> But don't you need root to add extentions?
>>Who's responsible if you just write a C module which hijacks the
>>descriptors?
> Again, you need an admin to update apache's config.
you need an admin to update the config file if you're trying to use the
LoadModule directive. but if mod_perl's already running (and if
.htaccess files aren't locked down enough), you can use the SetHandler
to load up any (malicous) modules you might need. afaik, loading a
module once in mod_perl will make it available to every child process.
if i've been reading this thread right (and there's a good chance i
haven't) then this would give EvilModule.pm access to the leaked fd's.
(i haven't tested this for httpd2/mod_perl2, but i know it holds true
for httpd1.3.x/mod_perl, and the new docs don't indicate any changes).
-jon
--
jon (at) divisionbyzero (dot) com [email concealed] || www.divisionbyzero.com
gpg key: www.divisionbyzero.com/pubkey.asc
think i have a virus? www.divisionbyzero.com/pgp.html
"You are in a twisty little maze of Sendmail rules, all confusing."
[ reply ]