|
|
BugTraq
Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 22 2004 05:25PM Richard M. Smith (rms computerbytesman com) (2 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 23 2004 03:28PM Brian C. Lane (bcl brianlane com) (2 replies) Re: [work] Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 24 2004 06:46PM opticfiber (opticfiber topsight net) (1 replies) Re: [work] Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 24 2004 08:27PM Jonathan A. Zdziarski (jonathan nuclearelephant com) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 23 2004 08:59PM Kevin Reardon (Kevin Reardon oracle com) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 23 2004 03:29AM ~Kevin Davis³ (computerguy cfl rr com) (3 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 23 2004 07:58PM Kirk Spencer (kspencer ngrl org) (1 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 23 2004 06:48PM Daniel Capo tco net br (2 replies) Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate Jan 24 2004 07:11PM Dinesh Nair (dinesh alphaque com) (1 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> > Which means the Democrats screwed up setting up their own share point and
> > allowed public access to it. There was no "computer glitch" which was
> > "exploited". This was completely a human screw-up. And there was no
> > hacking ("exploitation of a computer glitch") done by the Republicans.
> > Unless you wish to call clicking on a share point configured with public
> > access and opening it up "hacking".
>
> AFAIK, "hacking" is legally defined in the USA as being unauthorized
> access to computer resources. It doesn't matter if the resource was
> adequately protected (or protected at all) in first place or not. If you
> were not given permission to make use of that resource, you are
> criminally liable.
>
Do you have an explicit permission to read the content of a www.cnn.com?
What is the difference between opening a web URL and a network share?
--
Mariusz Wo³oszyn
Internet Security Specialist, GTS - Internet Partners
[ reply ]