BugTraq
Why are postmasters distributing the MyDoom virus? Feb 07 2004 07:15PM
Richard M. Smith (rms computerbytesman com) (2 replies)
Re: Why are postmasters distributing the MyDoom virus? Feb 10 2004 09:36PM
Georg Schwarz (geos epost de)
Re: Why are postmasters distributing the MyDoom virus? Feb 10 2004 06:29PM
David F. Skoll (dfs roaringpenguin com) (1 replies)
Re: Why are postmasters distributing the MyDoom virus? Feb 11 2004 01:16AM
mgotts 2roads com
> > I was looking over the MyDoom email messages that I received todayand
found
> > about 15 copies of the worm which came from postmasters in bounce
messages.
> > Some postmasters, when sending out a bounce message, include the
original
> > email message as an attachment. If a bounce message is for a
> > MyDoom-infected message, the bounce message will sometimes includean
intact
> > copy of the MyDoom executable which can be run by mistake with a few
mouse
> > clicks.
>
> This is sometimes unavoidable. A lot of MyDoom's go to nonexistent
> recipients, and when they are failed with a 5xx failure code, the
sending
> relay (quite reasonably) includes the original message in the bounce.
>

Not only do a lot of MyDoom's go to nonexistent recipients, they go to
nonexistent recipients *by design*. These are intentional bounces where
the worm is putting a simple but typically nonexistent email address in
the "To:" and putting it's intended target address in the "From:". Then it
uses the 5xx failures to deliver the worm via the bounce mechanism, so
that the recipient gets an actual non-delivery report, not a faked one.

It is a subtle distinction, but I don't recall this method of delivery
being used previously. All those bounces/rejections you see in your
mail-server logs for "bill (at) yourdomain (dot) com [email concealed]", "jane (at) yourdomain (dot) com [email concealed]",
"john (at) yourdomain (dot) com [email concealed]", and "sam (at) yourdomain (dot) com [email concealed]", etc. are NOT really
attempts to deliver the worm to those made-up addresses (though I doubt
the worm author would mind if the addresses did exist...). They are meant
to bounce to the *actual* intended recipient, who is listed in the "From:"

I agree that the 5xx failures correctly bounce the complete message. But
it is that predictable process that is being exploited by the worm author.

-- Mark

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus