When run locally, software installation is blocked.
Using IE 6.0.2900.2096 SP2, WinXP SP2
I've gotta say that SP2 has some VERY nice protection builtin. On the downside, I still havn't figured out how to turn it off ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin (at) lists.netsys (dot) com [email concealed]
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin (at) lists.netsys (dot) com [email concealed]] On Behalf Of Jelmer
> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 21:22
> To: bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Cc: full-disclosure (at) lists.netsys (dot) com [email concealed]; peter (at) diplomatmail (dot) net [email concealed]
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Internet explorer 6 execution of
> arbitrary code (An analysis of the 180 Solutions Trojan)
>
> Just when I though it was save to once more use internet
> explorer I received an email bringing my attention to this
> webpage http://216.130.188.219/ei2/installer.htm that
> according to him used an exploit that affected fully patched
> internet explorer 6 browsers. Being rather skeptical I
> carelessly clicked on the link only to witness how it
> automatically installed addware on my pc!!!
>
> Now there had been reports about 0day exploits making rounds
> for quite some time like for instance this post
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/363338/2004-05-11/2004-05-17/0
>
> However I hadn't seen any evidence to support this up until
> now Thor Larholm as usual added to the confusion by
> deliberately spreading disinformation as seen in this post
>
> http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2004/May/0153.html
>
> Attributing it to and I quote "just one of the remaining IE
> vulnerabilities that are not yet patched"
>
> I've attempted to write up an analysis that will show that
> there are at least 2 new and AFAIK unpublished
> vulnerabilities (feel free to proof me
> wrong) out there in the wild, one being fairly sophisticated
>
> You can view it at:
>
> http://62.131.86.111/analysis.htm
>
> Additionally you can view a harmless demonstration of the
> vulnerabilities at
>
> http://62.131.86.111/security/idiots/repro/installer.htm
>
> Finally I also attached the source files to this message
>
>
Line: 1
Char: 1
Error: Access is denied.
Code: 0
URL: http://62.131.86.111/security/idiots/repro/installer.htm
When run locally, software installation is blocked.
Using IE 6.0.2900.2096 SP2, WinXP SP2
I've gotta say that SP2 has some VERY nice protection builtin. On the downside, I still havn't figured out how to turn it off ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin (at) lists.netsys (dot) com [email concealed]
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin (at) lists.netsys (dot) com [email concealed]] On Behalf Of Jelmer
> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 21:22
> To: bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Cc: full-disclosure (at) lists.netsys (dot) com [email concealed]; peter (at) diplomatmail (dot) net [email concealed]
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Internet explorer 6 execution of
> arbitrary code (An analysis of the 180 Solutions Trojan)
>
> Just when I though it was save to once more use internet
> explorer I received an email bringing my attention to this
> webpage http://216.130.188.219/ei2/installer.htm that
> according to him used an exploit that affected fully patched
> internet explorer 6 browsers. Being rather skeptical I
> carelessly clicked on the link only to witness how it
> automatically installed addware on my pc!!!
>
> Now there had been reports about 0day exploits making rounds
> for quite some time like for instance this post
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/363338/2004-05-11/2004-05-17/0
>
> However I hadn't seen any evidence to support this up until
> now Thor Larholm as usual added to the confusion by
> deliberately spreading disinformation as seen in this post
>
> http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2004/May/0153.html
>
> Attributing it to and I quote "just one of the remaining IE
> vulnerabilities that are not yet patched"
>
> I've attempted to write up an analysis that will show that
> there are at least 2 new and AFAIK unpublished
> vulnerabilities (feel free to proof me
> wrong) out there in the wild, one being fairly sophisticated
>
> You can view it at:
>
> http://62.131.86.111/analysis.htm
>
> Additionally you can view a harmless demonstration of the
> vulnerabilities at
>
> http://62.131.86.111/security/idiots/repro/installer.htm
>
> Finally I also attached the source files to this message
>
>
[ reply ]