|
|
BugTraq
Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables Jun 15 2004 06:42AM Radko Keves (rado unitra sk) (3 replies) Re: Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables Jun 18 2004 05:08PM Jason V. Miller (jmiller securityfocus com) Re: Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables Jun 17 2004 11:28AM Manuel Bouyer (bouyer antioche eu org) (2 replies) Re: Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables Jun 18 2004 08:25PM Henning Brauer (hb-bugtraq bsws de) Re: Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables Jun 15 2004 07:01PM des des no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) (2 replies) Re: Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables Jun 17 2004 02:33PM Eygene A. Ryabinkin (rea rea mbslab kiae ru) (2 replies) Re: Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables Jun 18 2004 06:01PM Christian Ullrich (chris chrullrich de) Re: Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables Jun 18 2004 05:18PM Jason V. Miller (jmiller securityfocus com) Re: Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables Jun 17 2004 09:14AM Ivaylo Kostadinov (ivaylo kostadinov computing-services oxford ac uk) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:42:23AM +0200, Radko Keves wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > AFFECTED DISTRIBUTIONS:
> > FreeBSD 5.x i386
> > FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD is most likely also affected (investigation needed)
>
> NetBSD is not, a LKM can't be loaded if securelevel is > 0.
Note *very* carefully the fact that the statement "you can't load a LKM" is not
totally identical to "you can't cause an LKM to be in the kernel".
Hunt down the Phrack article on loading an LKM into a Linux kernel *that
doesn't even have module support*, and ask yourself if you're quite as sure
that there is *zero* vulnerability there....
[ reply ]