BugTraq
RE: Microsoft technologies. By default, non-HIPAA compliant? Jun 30 2004 06:44PM
Cameron, Thomas (Thomas Cameron bankofamerica com) (1 replies)
Re: Microsoft technologies. By default, non-HIPAA compliant? Jun 30 2004 07:50PM
Dave Paris (dparis w3works com)
Believe it. Banking is concerned with regulatory requiprements,
Medical/HIPAA is concerned with privacy of data on every level,
appropriate access to data, the ability to access data in an emergency
in a secure, aduitable manner, and all other variations of
complexities. The basic HIPAA electronic security guidelines consist of
mandatory and "addressable" components. How each company addresses the
"addressable" components is open to interpretation. Banking is
stringent, to be sure - but HIPAA takes accountability and privacy to a
whole new level.

Kind Regards,
-dsp

Cameron, Thomas wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Anything But Microsoft [mailto:abm (at) anythingbutmicrosoft (dot) org [email concealed]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 9:43 PM
>>To: <@securityfocus.com BUGTRAQ
>>Cc: secure (at) microsoft (dot) com [email concealed]
>>Subject: Microsoft technologies. By default, non-HIPAA compliant?
>>
>>
>>The US health care system is the only industry where best network and
>>security practices are a federally mandated requirement.
>>
>>
>
>Um, no. I work in the banking industry and we are federally regulated and audited for security. I've never worked in the medical industry but I'd be surprised if their requirements are more stringent than ours.
>
>
[....]

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus