|
|
BugTraq
Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines Jul 02 2004 09:04PM OIS (announcements oisafety org) (2 replies) Re: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and ResponseGuidelines Jul 04 2004 06:56PM Fred Mobach (fred mobach nl) (1 replies) Re: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and ResponseGuidelines Jul 08 2004 02:56AM ET LoWNOISE (et cyberspace org) Re: [Full-Disclosure] Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines Jul 04 2004 05:18PM dave (dave immunitysec com) (3 replies) Re: [Full-Disclosure] Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines Jul 06 2004 09:21PM rsh idirect com Re: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines Jul 05 2004 07:30PM Pete Herzog (pete isecom org) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> It's rare, but there are still security companies and individuals who do
> not owe their entire business to money from Microsoft. It's July 4th.
> and some of us are Americans who understand the concept of independance.
I am not american, but I have to agree to all of the following:
- Nobody trusts the OIS or its motives.
- the purpose of the OIS is to lobby towards a business model for Microsoft
and the other OIS members that involves the removal of non-compliant
security researchers.
- This call for feedback is a thinly disguised attempt to get public
legitimacy and allow the OIS to claim it has community backing, which it
clearly does not.
Cheers,
Halvar Flake
--
"Sie haben neue Mails!" - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen!
Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info
[ reply ]