|
|
BugTraq
RE: Unchecked buffer in mstask.dll Jul 14 2004 11:50PM psz maths usyd edu au (Paul Szabo) (2 replies) RE: Unchecked buffer in mstask.dll Jul 16 2004 04:22AM Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov (D Yu Bolkhovityanov inp nsk su) (1 replies) RE: [ok] [Full-Disclosure] RE: Unchecked buffer in mstask.dll Jul 16 2004 07:29PM Curt Purdy (purdy tecman com) Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Unchecked buffer in mstask.dll Jul 15 2004 01:32AM Jordan Cole (stilist) (stilist gmail com) (1 replies) Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Unchecked buffer in mstask.dll Jul 15 2004 03:03AM Nick FitzGerald (nick virus-l demon co uk) (1 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> > I'd say that's because you changed the filetype; pif files simply
> > contain information on how to handle a DOS executable; they aren't a
> > program themselves. All you did was make it get confused and kill
> > itself.
>
> Yeah, but how long is it now since we've been telling programmers
> "don't trust user-supplied data"?? (Hmmmm -- does it also fail on
> W2K3??)
No, in W2K3 you get "Cannot query the properties for this program. There may
not be enough memory available. blah blah" as opposed to 100% cpu in 2K.
Curt Purdy CISSP, GSEC, MCSE+I, CNE, CCDA
Information Security Engineer
DP Solutions
----------------------------------------
If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- former White House cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke
[ reply ]