BugTraq
eSafe: Could this be exploited? Jul 23 2004 06:21PM
Hugo van der Kooij (hvdkooij vanderkooij org) (3 replies)
Re: eSafe: Could this be exploited? Jul 24 2004 11:27AM
3APA3A (3APA3A SECURITY NNOV RU) (2 replies)
Re: eSafe: Could this be exploited? Jul 26 2004 05:26AM
MegaHz (megahz gmail com) (1 replies)
I have tested it out, and esafe blocked the hole email that contains
the eicar virus.
Of course I have configure esafe to block virus infected emails
instead of modifying them and removing the virus.

MegaHz
www.megahz.org
megahz (at) megahz (dot) org [email concealed]

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 15:27:43 +0400, 3APA3A <3apa3a (at) security.nnov (dot) ru [email concealed]> wrote:
> Dear Hugo van der Kooij,
>
> --Friday, July 23, 2004, 10:21:22 PM, you wrote to bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]:
>
> HvdK> Both as NitroEngine or CVP server they will push as much of 80% to the
> HvdK> end-user before they stop a virus. Then they rely on the adding of the
> HvdK> exact URL so that URL can be blocked in all next requests.
>
> It depends on how antiviral check is actually implemented. If connection
> is broken immediately after signature is detected - there is no way to
> download infected file, because signature will not pass to client and
> client will not be able to use "Range:" header to resume partially
> downloaded file.
>
> If antiviral filter checks data _after_ all data received from client
> with 20% buffering yes, it's possible to bypass this check for HTTP,
> because there is no way (at least for HTTP/1.0 and FTP) to indicate
> error to client and make him to delete partially downloaded data.
>
> You can check it, by sending EICAR with some additional data: if you can
> find EICAR signature on the client after connection is broken by
> antiviral filter you can bypass it's protection.
>
> --
> ~/ZARAZA
> Ð?аÑ?ина оказаласÑ? способной к единсÑ?венномÑ? дейсÑ?виÑ?,
> а именно Ñ?множениÑ? 2x2, да и Ñ?о пÑ?и эÑ?ом оÑ?ибаясÑ?. (Ð?ем)
>
>

[ reply ]
Re: eSafe: Could this be exploited? Jul 26 2004 08:26PM
Hugo van der Kooij (hvdkooij vanderkooij org) (1 replies)
Re: eSafe: Could this be exploited? Jul 28 2004 09:30AM
Kev Ford (kev frod co uk) (1 replies)
Re: eSafe: Could this be exploited? Jul 30 2004 12:34AM
Nick FitzGerald (nick virus-l demon co uk)
Re: eSafe: Could this be exploited? Jul 25 2004 02:24PM
Andreas Constantinides (MegaHz) (megahz megahz org)
Re: eSafe: Could this be exploited? Jul 24 2004 01:22AM
Nick FitzGerald (nick virus-l demon co uk)
Re: eSafe: Could this be exploited? Jul 23 2004 07:49PM
Oliver (at) greyhat (dot) de [email concealed] (Oliver greyhat de)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus