BugTraq
Fwd: New possible scam method : forged websites using XUL (Firefox) Jul 30 2004 09:05PM
David Ahmad (da securityfocus com) (1 replies)
Re: New possible scam method : forged websites using XUL (Firefox) Jul 31 2004 11:15AM
Marc (md nomensa com) (3 replies)
RE: New possible scam method : forged websites using XUL (Firefox) Aug 02 2004 01:02PM
Thomas T. Evans, III (ttevans hawkcorp net)
Re: New possible scam method : forged websites using XUL (Firefox) Aug 02 2004 09:59AM
Peter J. Holzer (hjp wsr ac at) (1 replies)
On 2004-07-31 12:15:46 +0100, Marc wrote:
> The latest version of Firefox is 0.9.2.
>
> > The developers of Mozilla are currently looking into various
> > methods to make a fake user interface more obvious. The most
> > likely solution will be to force the status bar to always be
> > visible, as Microsoft will do with IE6 SP2.
>
> This appears to be the case with 0.9.2.
> The spoofed PayPal site (from
> http://www.nd.edu/~jsmith30/xul/test/spoof.html) cannot hide FireFox's
> status bar - so you get 2 status bars displayed.

On my system (Linux with fvwm2 window manager) the window has just the
right size to show the fake status bar but hide the real status bar. The
missing bottom window border is the only indication that there may be
something wrong (and that's not a big indication, since windows that
don't fit entirely on the screen aren't that uncommon).

A quote from <URL:http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22183#c77>:

| Anyway, we already put a dark inset border around untrusted chrome, we
| already say [Javascript Application] on alerts, we already allow the
| user to disable the disabling of the status bar, and so forth. Without
| making ourselves the laughing stock of the Web browser implementer
| community, there is little more we can do.

It looks like firefox doesn't "put a dark inset border around untrusted
chrome". Is there a similar exploit for Mozilla 1.7, to see whetehr that
border would be noticable (the URLs in the bug don't work).

Anyway, there are a few more things that Mozilla (suite or firefox)
could do:

* allow user to disable hiding of chrome (like disabling popups, etc.)

* add a UI to the "allow javascript only from trusted sites" feature.
(few people know that mozilla can do that, and even for those, editing
user.js is tedious).

hp

--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Shooting the users in the foot is bad.
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR / LUGA | Giving them a gun isn't.
| | | hjp (at) wsr.ac (dot) at [email concealed] | -- Gordon Schumacher,
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | mozilla bug #84128

[ reply ]
Re: New possible scam method : forged websites using XUL (Firefox) Aug 03 2004 08:11AM
Peter J. Holzer (hjp wsr ac at) (2 replies)
Re: New possible scam method : forged websites using XUL (Firefox) Aug 03 2004 07:10PM
Michael Reilly (michaelr cisco com)
Re: New possible scam method : forged websites using XUL (Firefox) Aug 03 2004 06:13PM
Kim Scarborough (kjs uchicago edu)
Re: New possible scam method : forged websites using XUL (Firefox) Aug 01 2004 07:43PM
Nicholas Knight (nknight runawaynet com) (1 replies)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus