BugTraq
RE: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes Sep 23 2004 10:21AM
Jeremy Epstein (jeremy epstein webmethods com) (7 replies)
RE: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes Sep 27 2004 06:25PM
Greg A. Woods (woods weird com) (1 replies)
Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes Sep 28 2004 03:38AM
Marco S Hyman (marc snafu org) (2 replies)
Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes Sep 28 2004 08:20PM
Simon (lists sime org uk) (3 replies)
Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes Sep 29 2004 01:45AM
David F. Skoll (dfs roaringpenguin com)
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Simon wrote:

> Sometimes, IMHO, there's just no alternative to pen and paper. Surely
> the manual method of ticking a box and having multiple human vote
> counters checking ballots is the best option going, even if it is more
> expensive. (I confess I've no idea what costs are involved either way.)

According to Elections Canada, the 2000 general election cost $200.6
million (Canadian dollars). But this included everything, including
maintenance of voter registries, reimbursement of expenses to
political parties and candidates, etc.

Source: http://www.elections.ca/content.asp?section=faq&document=faqelec&lang=e

In that election, there were 28,846,761 voters, so the cost
per voter was around $6.95 Canadian, or $5.43 US.

I suspect that the cost to actually count the votes is significantly less
than this figure. I have no idea what the figures are for electronic
voting, but I doubt it can be done for much under $4 to $5/voter.

Consider that the average polling station contributes a couple of
hundred votes to the total. So you can hire six people at $25/hour
for 5 hours each (two shifts) to man the station and count the
ballots afterwards, and you've spent $750, some of which you recover
in the form of income tax. :-)

Now how many voting machines would such a polling station require? And can
you buy a super-de-duper-de-luxe voting machine for $750?

--
David.

[ reply ]
RE: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Sep 27 2004 11:25AM
Paul Wouters (paul xtdnet nl) (2 replies)
Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Sep 28 2004 12:08AM
Adam Shostack (adam homeport org)
Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Sep 28 2004 12:00AM
Crispin Cowan (crispin immunix com) (1 replies)
RE: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Sep 29 2004 08:05AM
David Schwartz (davids webmaster com)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus