BugTraq
RE: Update: Web browsers - a mini-farce (MSIE gives in) Oct 29 2004 07:25PM
David Brodbeck (DavidB mail interclean com) (2 replies)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Newsham [mailto:newsham (at) lava (dot) net [email concealed]]

> But lets assume that a good programmer is writing software and
> it comes to his attention that there is a buffer overflow, or
> that user input is not being filtered, or that user input is being
> passed to a printf type function. What happens next? Well, it
> depends on how many bugs there are, how much other work needs
> to be done, and very importantly, what the perceived impact of
> that bug is. You cannot imagine how many times a bug is pointed
> out and the author of the software says "ok, that bug can only
> happen if the user does something stupid, and it is not exploitable.
> Lets defer that one."

This suggests that it's reasonable for a program to segfault because the
user made a mistake, instead of having some non-fatal form of error
handling. I don't think that should be acceptable at all, though I agree
it's very common. If I had a dollar for every time I've lost work because a
segfault or GPF happened before I saved my document...

[ reply ]
Re: Update: Web browsers - a mini-farce (MSIE gives in) Oct 29 2004 07:38PM
Valdis Kletnieks vt edu (1 replies)
Re: Update: Web browsers - a mini-farce (MSIE gives in) Oct 29 2004 10:34PM
infamous41md hotpop com
RE: Update: Web browsers - a mini-farce (MSIE gives in) Oct 29 2004 07:30PM
Tim Newsham (newsham lava net)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus