> Run in OllyDbg, we find that the above string makes the program attempt
> to JMP to 0x00420042. It just so happens that Hex 42 is a "B". So the
> two B's at the end of the exploit string change the instrucation pointer.
>
> As far as I can tell, this is not exploitable to run a shellcode because
> of the fact that NULL's are inserted between charactors.
Ah, but what if the 2 trailing B's are replaced by 2 Unicode chars that
together take up 4 bytes? ;)
> But besides
> that, it would only give the same privliges that you already have to run
> the program in the first place. It simply points out bad coding.
If you can find a way to programmaticaly call the same code, this can be
leveraged by a trojan code. Consider: If there was a way to get a user to
click on a URL that resolved to a file share and fall into this code, this
could be used as an initial attack point for a worm.....
> Run in OllyDbg, we find that the above string makes the program attempt
> to JMP to 0x00420042. It just so happens that Hex 42 is a "B". So the
> two B's at the end of the exploit string change the instrucation pointer.
>
> As far as I can tell, this is not exploitable to run a shellcode because
> of the fact that NULL's are inserted between charactors.
Ah, but what if the 2 trailing B's are replaced by 2 Unicode chars that
together take up 4 bytes? ;)
> But besides
> that, it would only give the same privliges that you already have to run
> the program in the first place. It simply points out bad coding.
If you can find a way to programmaticaly call the same code, this can be
leveraged by a trojan code. Consider: If there was a way to get a user to
click on a URL that resolved to a file share and fall into this code, this
could be used as an initial attack point for a worm.....
[ reply ]