|
BugTraq
Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments? Nov 22 2004 10:27AM James Youngman (bugtraq excession spiral-arm org) (1 replies) Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments? Nov 22 2004 06:05PM Martin Buchholz (Martin Buchholz Sun COM) (2 replies) Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments? Nov 22 2004 11:51PM James Youngman (bugtraq excession spiral-arm org) (3 replies) Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments? Nov 24 2004 05:24AM devnull Rodents Montreal QC CA Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments? Nov 23 2004 02:05AM Martin Buchholz (Martin Buchholz Sun COM) (1 replies) Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments? Nov 23 2004 09:17AM James Youngman (bugtraq excession spiral-arm org) (1 replies) Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments? Nov 23 2004 05:59PM Martin Buchholz (Martin Buchholz Sun COM) Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments? Nov 22 2004 06:33PM Dmitry V. Levin (ldv altlinux org) |
|
Privacy Statement |
>I can see that that would be useful but it would fail to comply with
>the POSIX standard, which specifies:
>
> The find utility shall be able to descend to arbitrary
> depths in a file hierarchy and shall not fail due to path
> length limitations (unless a path operand specified by the
> application exceeds {PATH_MAX} requirements)
But PATH_MAX is limited and the number of file descriptors is perhaps
not.
(On Solaris, PATH_MAX is 1024 so you require at most 512 file
descriptors to keep the stack of directories: 512 is less than the
default hard limit of 65536 file descriptors per process [S9, S8
and before used 1024, still >> 512)
Casper
[ reply ]