BugTraq
Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 14 2004 10:32AM
Paul Starzetz (ihaquer isec pl) (2 replies)
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 23 2004 03:54PM
Pavel Kankovsky (peak argo troja mff cuni cz)
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 15 2004 03:23AM
even multiplexed (Shadow333 gmx at) (1 replies)
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 15 2004 12:31PM
Paul Starzetz (ihaquer isec pl) (3 replies)
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 23 2004 03:59AM
Valdis Kletnieks vt edu
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 15 2004 08:48PM
gadgeteer elegantinnovations org
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 15 2004 12:52PM
even multiplexed (Shadow333 gmx at)
Paul Starzetz wrote:

>On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, even multiplexed wrote:
>
>
>
>>attention.i just wanted to ask if anyone has a tip for me how to
>>quickfix this bug, without actually rebuilding a patched version of the
>>kernel.
>>
>>
>
>I don't think this is practicable, since the bugs reside in deep kernel
>functions. You can not fix it just by disabling a particular syscall. You
>have patch a running kernel binary, maybe someone comes up with this kind
>of utlility.
>
>
>
well, i was also examining the igmp exploit you posted earlier, that one
was relatively easy to disable, by setting the following sysctl vars:

net.ipv4.igmp_max_msf = 0
net.ipv4.igmp_max_memberships = 0
net.ipv4.icmp_ignore_bogus_error_responses = 1

since i dont really need igmp support on that server=)

its just that scm_send thing, that i didnt find any config option for...
so i guess that means either waiting till someone of the kernel
maintainers release a patch, or get one of my friends, that is better on
programming tasks, to fix that one...
all at all makes for quite a risky day for a shell provider...

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus