BugTraq
Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 14 2004 10:32AM
Paul Starzetz (ihaquer isec pl) (2 replies)
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 23 2004 03:54PM
Pavel Kankovsky (peak argo troja mff cuni cz)
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 15 2004 03:23AM
even multiplexed (Shadow333 gmx at) (1 replies)
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 15 2004 12:31PM
Paul Starzetz (ihaquer isec pl) (3 replies)
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 23 2004 03:59AM
Valdis Kletnieks vt edu
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:31:30 +0100, Paul Starzetz said:
> I don't think this is practicable, since the bugs reside in deep kernel
> functions. You can not fix it just by disabling a particular syscall. You
> have patch a running kernel binary, maybe someone comes up with this kind
> of utlility.

Majorly scary. I've done similar patch-on-the-fly on many different systems
in the past 25 years. You *really* want to install a proper patch and reboot.

If you can't tolerate the 10-20 minutes of downtime a scheduled reboot will
take, you can't tolerate the hours of downtime you'll get if you get hacked.
So either bite the bullet and reboot, or get redundant gear so you have good
fail-over while you reboot.

(Note that *some* bugs in the Linux kernel can at least theoretically be
fixed on the fly with an rmmod of the buggy module and an insmod of a patched
version built against the same source tree. The bugs in question aren't in
code that's likely to be rmmod'able on a running production system....)

[ reply ]
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 15 2004 08:48PM
gadgeteer elegantinnovations org
Re: Linux kernel scm_send local DoS Dec 15 2004 12:52PM
even multiplexed (Shadow333 gmx at)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus