|
BugTraq
SHA-1 broken Feb 16 2005 12:56PM Gadi Evron (gadi tehila gov il) (5 replies) Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:25AM Robert Sussland (robert inkwood org) (1 replies) Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 10:42PM dullien gmx de (2 replies) Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:02AM Michael Cordover (michael cordover gmail com) (3 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> Now, we've all seen this coming for a while.
> http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
>
> Where do we go from here?
I am feeling smug that in a project I am working on I earlier decided
our integrity hashes would be a concatenation of MD5 and SHA-1, not
that that's a fix, but it helps.
I am also appreciating that hashes are used (this project included)
for many different things, not all of which are directly affected by
this break. Yes, this is a bad omen for the longevity of SHA-1 for
other uses, so we will keep an eye on it.
Something I am intrigued about is more sophiticated compositions of,
say, SHA-1 and MD5.
-kb
[ reply ]