SecurityFocus

SHA-1 broken Feb 16 2005 12:56PM
Gadi Evron (gadi tehila gov il) (5 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 02:44PM
Jonathan G. Lampe (jonathan lampe standardnetworks com)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:28AM
Steve Friedl (steve unixwiz net)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:25AM
Robert Sussland (robert inkwood org) (1 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 10:42PM
dullien gmx de (2 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 19 2005 05:24PM
Darren Reed (avalon caligula anu edu au) (1 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 19 2005 05:41PM
dullien gmx de

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 19 2005 01:22PM
Tollef Fog Heen (tfheen err no) (1 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 20 2005 09:45AM
Denis Jedig (seclists syneticon de)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:02AM
Michael Cordover (michael cordover gmail com) (3 replies)

The standard response to "where to now" seems to be Whirlpool
[http://planeta.terra.com.br/informatica/paulobarreto/WhirlpoolPage.html
].
That or Tiger [http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~biham/Reports/Tiger/].

The team which has cracked SHA1 is the same that cracked MD5 and
exposed weaknesses in the RIPEMD model. They're good. And they've
shown that what I would've thought to be the Next Best Thing - RIPEMD
- is yet another flawed system.

-mjec
--
http://mine.mjec.net/

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:56:27 +0200, Gadi Evron <gadi (at) tehila.gov (dot) il [email concealed]> wrote:
> Now, we've all seen this coming for a while.
> http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
>
> Where do we go from here?
>
> Gadi.
>

[ reply ]

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 18 2005 02:22AM
Dan Harkless (bugtraq harkless org)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 11:32PM
D.J. Capelis (djcapelisp yahoo com) (1 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 19 2005 03:37AM
Michael Cordover (michael cordover gmail com)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 10:39PM
dullien gmx de

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 16 2005 11:27PM
Kent Borg (kentborg borg org)