|
BugTraq
AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities Feb 14 2005 08:10AM GHC@www.securityfocus.com,[ru]@securityfocus.com@www.securityfocus.com (foster ghc ru) (1 replies) Re: AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities Feb 15 2005 03:24PM Ondra Holecek (bln deprese net) (1 replies) Re: AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities - can't reproduce in 6.3? Feb 15 2005 07:25PM Jamie Pratt (jpratt norwich edu) (2 replies) Re: AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities - can't reproduce in 6.3? Feb 15 2005 09:00PM twebster daksoft com Re: AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities - can't reproduce in 6.3? Feb 15 2005 07:52PM Ondra Holecek (bln deprese net) (2 replies) Re: AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities - can't reproduce in 6.3? Feb 15 2005 09:38PM Herman Sheremetyev (herman swebpage com) (1 replies) Re: AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities - can't reproduce in 6.3? Feb 15 2005 09:46PM Jamie Pratt (jpratt norwich edu) (2 replies) Re: AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities - can't reproduce in 6.3? Feb 16 2005 08:52PM Micah Brandon (brandon vv com) (1 replies) Re: AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities - can't reproduce in 6.3? Feb 16 2005 02:47PM Thom Craver (tcraver corp-com com) Re: AWStats <= 6.4 Multiple vulnerabilities - can't reproduce in 6.3? Feb 15 2005 09:23PM Ondra Holecek (bln deprese net) |
|
Privacy Statement |
same plugin architecture. Could this be a >= 6.0 bug?
Matt
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:52:00 -0500, Micah Brandon <brandon (at) vv (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm going to have to disagree. Execution of Perl functions
> is still possible in 6.3. You just have to jimmy it a little and
> try/guess different plugins that may be installed. I got a hit
> with 'hostinfo'. Try this on your server:
>
> http://server/cgi-bin/awstats.pl?config=someconfig&PluginMode=hostinfo+t
ime
>
> Unix time shows up just below 'Whois command failed' error message.
> That's game over in my book.
>
> * Jamie Pratt (jpratt (at) norwich (dot) edu [email concealed]) [050216 01:19]:
> > Still no dice on 6.3, even with the "config=www.site.org" etc,etc.. same
> > error. So.. Can we all agree that 6.3 is not vulnerable, because I'd
> > rather not upgrade to a dev/unstable release for no reason...
> >
> > regards,
> > jamie
> >
> > Herman Sheremetyev wrote:
> > >It works on mine too, though I still have 6.1. I think you may need to
> > >add the config=www.example.com into the url between the '?' and the '&'
> > >for it to work properly though. On my linux boxes with apache 2.0 it
> > >displays the command output in the page but on openbsd with apache 1.3
> > >it gives a 500 Server Error because the output ends up in the headers
> > >somehow. Either way it works though.
> > >
> > >-Herman
> > >
>
>
[ reply ]