SecurityFocus

SHA-1 broken Feb 16 2005 12:56PM
Gadi Evron (gadi tehila gov il) (5 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 02:44PM
Jonathan G. Lampe (jonathan lampe standardnetworks com)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:28AM
Steve Friedl (steve unixwiz net)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:25AM
Robert Sussland (robert inkwood org) (1 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 10:42PM
dullien gmx de (2 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 19 2005 05:24PM
Darren Reed (avalon caligula anu edu au) (1 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 19 2005 05:41PM
dullien gmx de

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 19 2005 01:22PM
Tollef Fog Heen (tfheen err no) (1 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 20 2005 09:45AM
Denis Jedig (seclists syneticon de)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:02AM
Michael Cordover (michael cordover gmail com) (3 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 18 2005 02:22AM
Dan Harkless (bugtraq harkless org)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 11:32PM
D.J. Capelis (djcapelisp yahoo com) (1 replies)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 19 2005 03:37AM
Michael Cordover (michael cordover gmail com)

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 10:39PM
dullien gmx de

Hey all,

> shown that what I would've thought to be the Next Best Thing - RIPEMD
> - is yet another flawed system.

As far as I know, RIPEMD-160 is unbroken, and
unlikely to be broken quickly because of the need to find
collisions for the two "separate channels". Or did they publish
a RIPEMD-160 attack together with the MD5 breaks ?

Cheers,
Thomas Dullien

[ reply ]

Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 16 2005 11:27PM
Kent Borg (kentborg borg org)