|
BugTraq
SHA-1 broken Feb 16 2005 12:56PM Gadi Evron (gadi tehila gov il) (5 replies) Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:25AM Robert Sussland (robert inkwood org) (1 replies) Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 10:42PM dullien gmx de (2 replies) Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:02AM Michael Cordover (michael cordover gmail com) (3 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
>
> Hey all,
>
> > We abandon the requirement of collision resistance. This is a strange
> > requirement, and is not supported by experience. Collision resistance
>
> we might think of changing the requirement of collision resistance
> to "collision resistance in input data that is valid ASCII text". The
> attacks on MD5 used the weak avalanche of the highest-order bit
> in 32-bit words for producing the collision, basically precluding the
> possibility of generating colliding ASCII text.
And what about the case for (uncompressed) binary images ?
Darren
[ reply ]