|
BugTraq
SHA-1 broken Feb 16 2005 12:56PM Gadi Evron (gadi tehila gov il) (5 replies) Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:25AM Robert Sussland (robert inkwood org) (1 replies) Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 10:42PM dullien gmx de (2 replies) Re: SHA-1 broken Feb 17 2005 01:02AM Michael Cordover (michael cordover gmail com) (3 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
| Hey all,
|
| > We abandon the requirement of collision resistance. This is a
| > strange requirement, and is not supported by experience. Collision
| > resistance
|
| we might think of changing the requirement of collision resistance
| to "collision resistance in input data that is valid ASCII text". The
| attacks on MD5 used the weak avalanche of the highest-order bit
| in 32-bit words for producing the collision, basically precluding the
| possibility of generating colliding ASCII text.
That's not really useful is you want to sign something in non-English
languages. Valid UTF8 might be a decent requirement, though.
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
[ reply ]