BugTraq
Security Flaw with Digital signatures in Microsoft Outlook Mar 25 2005 08:20PM
Roberto Franceschetti (roberto logsat com) (3 replies)
Re: Security Flaw with Digital signatures in Microsoft Outlook Mar 25 2005 09:20PM
Anthony G. Atkielski (anthony atkielski com)
Roberto writes:

> This 3rd email is yet another variation showing how a digitally
> signed email can further be forget without Outlook ever raising
> warning flags (follow the hyperlinks for the email's source):

Digitally-signed messages cannot be forged. However, only the body of a
digitally-signed message is actually included in the text covered by the
signature; the headers are excluded. That's not an Outlook
idiosyncrasy, it's just the way signed e-mail works.

In every screenshot you provide, Outlook correctly identifies the party
that created the digital signature. That's what a security-conscious
user will check. And the text of the message has not been changed, so
the signature is still valid, and no forgery has occurred.

I'm afraid I don't see any problem here. Yes, it's inconvenient that
one can forge the "From" line of a message, but in secure e-mail, one
doesn't rely on the "From" line, anyway, precisely because it can be so
easily forged. I suppose it might be nice if Outlook made the
discrepancy between the "From" line and the signer's authenticated
identity a bit more obvious, but that's not a security breach, just an
ergonomic issue.

--
Anthony

[ reply ]
Re: [bugtraq] Security Flaw with Digital signatures in Microsoft Outlook Mar 25 2005 04:50PM
Erwann ABALEA (erwann abalea certplus com) (1 replies)
RE: [bugtraq] Security Flaw with Digital signatures in Microsoft Outlook Mar 25 2005 10:39PM
Lyal Collins (lyal collins key2it com au)
RE: Security Flaw with Digital signatures in Microsoft Outlook Mar 25 2005 04:47PM
Adrian Floarea (adrian floarea uti ro)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus