* Bruno Wolff III (bruno (at) wolff (dot) to [email concealed]) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 22:27:01 -0400,
> Stephen Frost <sfrost (at) snowman (dot) net [email concealed]> wrote:
> > SHA2 would also be nice.
>
> I think the new hash functions are called SHA256 and SHA512.
> For Postgres' purposes the recent weaknesses found in SHA1 and MD5
> aren't a big deal.
Well, alright, SHA256 and SHA512. It would be nice to have Postgres
support them.
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 22:27:01 -0400,
> Stephen Frost <sfrost (at) snowman (dot) net [email concealed]> wrote:
> > SHA2 would also be nice.
>
> I think the new hash functions are called SHA256 and SHA512.
> For Postgres' purposes the recent weaknesses found in SHA1 and MD5
> aren't a big deal.
Well, alright, SHA256 and SHA512. It would be nice to have Postgres
support them.
Stephen
[ reply ]