BugTraq
RE: [Full-disclosure] Anonymous Web Attacks via DedicatedMobileServices Jul 23 2005 10:46PM
Bojan Zdrnja (Bojan Zdrnja LSS hr) (2 replies)
RE: [Full-disclosure] Anonymous Web Attacks via DedicatedMobileServices Jul 30 2005 07:04AM
Alexander Klimov (alserkli inbox ru)
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Bojan Zdrnja wrote:
> Regarding Google - yes, if you log only connections.
> However, when you use translate.google.com service, Google will add a new
> header in the HTTP request:
>
> X-Forwarded-For: <IP address>
>
> All proxy servers should add this header, even in the case of multiple
> proxying, in which case all IP addresses should be listed under this header.
>
> For Apache, there is even a mod_extract_forwarded module which should change
> the connection so it looks like it's coming from the IP behind the proxy
> server.
>

If you do assume that x-forwarded-for is always genuine then you will
have problems when somebody with direct connection adds
x-forwarded-for to confuse you (this is very similar to email
headers).

BTW: I don't sure that it is that important for real attackers -- most
of them are likely to use owned hosts anyway.

--
Regards,
ASK

[ reply ]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Anonymous Web Attacks viaDedicatedMobileServices Jul 25 2005 08:34AM
Petko Petkov (ppetkov gnucitizen org)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus