>> Unlike DRAM and SRAM, Flash etc. has no continual or repetitive
>> amplification function. Traces of previous charges may remain, but I
>> doubt they would be recoverable, except perhaps by the most drastic
>> forensic techniques
>
>I would expect flash memory content to be easily recoverable when
>opening the chip.
yes indeed ! there's remnants of charge left on the floating gates of
transistors, even after explicit attempts to erase; and they are
relatively straightforward to read out
have a look at Sergei Skorobogatov's research on this topic (and on data
remanence on semiconductors generally)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sps32/
--
richard Richard Clayton
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
<list0570 (at) paradise.net (dot) nz [email concealed]> writes
>> Unlike DRAM and SRAM, Flash etc. has no continual or repetitive
>> amplification function. Traces of previous charges may remain, but I
>> doubt they would be recoverable, except perhaps by the most drastic
>> forensic techniques
>
>I would expect flash memory content to be easily recoverable when
>opening the chip.
yes indeed ! there's remnants of charge left on the floating gates of
transistors, even after explicit attempts to erase; and they are
relatively straightforward to read out
have a look at Sergei Skorobogatov's research on this topic (and on data
remanence on semiconductors generally)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/sps32/
--
richard Richard Clayton
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
[ reply ]