Tim wrote:
> http://www.firewallleaktester.com/tests.htm
>
> So, after hearing about Kerio being discontinued I started poking
> around and someone posted a like to this site. Has anyone used this
> site? Some of this seems kinda sketchy to me, especially the testing
> methods. I am probably going to go setup some VM machines sometime and
> test out this software. I would really like to hear about people's
> experiences about this site, if any.
It seems like he only do outbound testing? Not very helpful and quite limited
then. Outbound protection is important, but not that important. It's a second
line of defence. I prefer to stop threats before they get inside. A test of
inbound protection would be more useful, IMHO.
If you ever go temporarily insane, don't shoot somebody, like a lot of
people do. Instead, try to get some weeding done, because
you'd really be surprised.
> http://www.firewallleaktester.com/tests.htm
>
> So, after hearing about Kerio being discontinued I started poking
> around and someone posted a like to this site. Has anyone used this
> site? Some of this seems kinda sketchy to me, especially the testing
> methods. I am probably going to go setup some VM machines sometime and
> test out this software. I would really like to hear about people's
> experiences about this site, if any.
It seems like he only do outbound testing? Not very helpful and quite limited
then. Outbound protection is important, but not that important. It's a second
line of defence. I prefer to stop threats before they get inside. A test of
inbound protection would be more useful, IMHO.
--
//Morten Torstensen
//Email: morten (at) mortent (dot) org [email concealed]
//IM: Cartoon (at) jabber (dot) no [email concealed] morten.torstensen (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]
If you ever go temporarily insane, don't shoot somebody, like a lot of
people do. Instead, try to get some weeding done, because
you'd really be surprised.
[ reply ]