The only attack vector we know about for Win9x, ME platforms is through
printing. I'm afraid that "fixing" that would break some functionality.
Greg
------------
This post is provided as is and confers no rights or whatever.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Polk [mailto:listuser.jav (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 6:21 AM
To: Brett Glass
Cc: bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results)
Brett Glass wrote:
>Question: Is Ilfak's patch still needed for Windows 95, 98, SE and ME
>systems, for which Microsoft is refusing to provide a patch? To what
>extent are these systems vulnerable if not patched?
>
>--Brett Glass
>
>
>
>
Actually, Ilfak never tested his patch on a Win 9x machine. Steve
Gibson, however, plans to write a
patch for 95, 98, and ME if Microsoft doesn't.
printing. I'm afraid that "fixing" that would break some functionality.
Greg
------------
This post is provided as is and confers no rights or whatever.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Polk [mailto:listuser.jav (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 6:21 AM
To: Brett Glass
Cc: bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results)
Brett Glass wrote:
>Question: Is Ilfak's patch still needed for Windows 95, 98, SE and ME
>systems, for which Microsoft is refusing to provide a patch? To what
>extent are these systems vulnerable if not patched?
>
>--Brett Glass
>
>
>
>
Actually, Ilfak never tested his patch on a Win 9x machine. Steve
Gibson, however, plans to write a
patch for 95, 98, and ME if Microsoft doesn't.
JP
[ reply ]