-----Original Message-----
From: Brooks, Shane [mailto:SBrooks (at) orangelake (dot) com [email concealed]]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 2:31 PM
To: bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: WMF vulnerability was a deliberate backdoor?
I've recently had my attention brought to a post from Steve Gibson in
the grc.com forums, which contains the following quote:
<snippet>
The only conclusion that can reasonably be drawn is that this
[setAbortProc procedure]
was a deliberate backdoor put into all of Microsoft's recent editions of
Windows. </snippet>
full article here:
http://www.grc.com/x/news.exe?cmd=article&group=grc.news.feedback&item=6
The information contained in this message is privileged, confidential
and
intended only for use of the individual or entity addressed above. If
you
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us
by reply and delete the same. Thank you.
http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2006/01/13/417431.aspx
-----Original Message-----
From: Brooks, Shane [mailto:SBrooks (at) orangelake (dot) com [email concealed]]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 2:31 PM
To: bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: WMF vulnerability was a deliberate backdoor?
I've recently had my attention brought to a post from Steve Gibson in
the grc.com forums, which contains the following quote:
<snippet>
The only conclusion that can reasonably be drawn is that this
[setAbortProc procedure]
was a deliberate backdoor put into all of Microsoft's recent editions of
Windows. </snippet>
full article here:
http://www.grc.com/x/news.exe?cmd=article&group=grc.news.feedback&item=6
0006
thoughts?
Shane
_________________________________________________________
The information contained in this message is privileged, confidential
and
intended only for use of the individual or entity addressed above. If
you
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us
by reply and delete the same. Thank you.
[ reply ]