|
BugTraq
Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 11 2006 04:35PM self-destruction itsbest com (4 replies) Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 16 2006 01:54PM Jon Gucinski (Jgucinski midwestbank com) (1 replies) Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 16 2006 09:34AM Radoslav DejanoviÄ? (radoslav dejanovic opsus hr) Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 16 2006 02:55AM Glynn Clements (glynn gclements plus com) Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 15 2006 06:22PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (3 replies) Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 17 2006 01:23PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (2 replies) Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 21 2006 11:48AM Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (2 replies) Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 22 2006 11:16AM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 20 2006 10:30AM Radoslav Dejanoviæ (radoslav dejanovic opsus hr) Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking Feb 16 2006 05:19PM Sysmin Sys73m47ic (sysmin systematic gmail com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
Worried your test network isn't "real" enough? Make it better! Throw in IDS,
patch management, whatever.
As Paul suggested, get your buddies involved. I've seen workshops where people
are designated "attacker" and "defender", objectives are obvious.
If kids / pro's aren't smart enough to realise the benefits of this kind of
exercise, they really have no business being in our trade.
I'm with Paul. I don't care *who* you are or how ethical you *think* you are,
it's not ethical to break into someone else's computer system without
authorization for whatever reason, and you should be prosecuted for it.
There are ample tools out there to setup a test network ranging from FOSS
tools like QEMU and commercial stuff like VMWare etc.
There's no excuse.
Max
> Oh, well that gives me great comfort. Never mind that I can be prosecuted
> for the breakin because I've violated a law such as GLB, HIPAA, etc. by
> "allowing" a breakin. I'm glad your friends are so "ethical". If you only
> think about what's in it for you, you'll always be slanted toward violating
> the law. Try thinking about the poor victim whose systems you're breaking
> in to. Put yourself in their shoes and ask yourself, how would I feel if I
> discovered that someone had entered my systems without my knowledge? Or
> bettter yet, how about if I reach in your pocket and take the keys to your
> car, take it out for a spin, then return it? Are you OK with that? No
> hard feelings?
>
> Paul Schmehl (pauls (at) utdallas (dot) edu [email concealed])
> Adjunct Information Security Officer
> University of Texas at Dallas
> AVIEN Founding Member
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBD9KwlkhbPZHlRz4MRAnIXAJ9jnLbPl+6EWbBvUdG55FXbzo7RrACfTdCr
FOZXooEiiv9Lob0O80EyQS8=
=/2Zx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[ reply ]