On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 Valdis.Kletnieks (at) vt (dot) edu [email concealed] wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:59:20 CST, Gadi Evron said:
> > Oh, sorry for not mentioning earlier -
> > Operators that want to patch Sendmail, I'd suggest doing it soon. Now we
> > not only do we face risk to our mail servers, but rather trusting other
> > servers as well.
>
> Been there, done that. All the same issues we saw when 8.12.9 came out:
Exactly. You just made my point.
>
> 8.12.9/8.12.9 2003/03/29
> SECURITY: Fix a buffer overflow in address parsing due to
> a char to int conversion problem which is potentially
> remotely exploitable. Problem found by Michal Zalewski.
> Note: an MTA that is not patched might be vulnerable to
> data that it receives from untrusted sources, which
> includes DNS.
>
> So just like last time - I'm sure somebody will patch their external-facing
> mailserver *first*, and that lets exploit mail get through the external
> mailer and reach the internal mailserver (where before it would just have
> 0wned the external server).
>
> Not that Sendmail is any different from any OTHER infrastructure software.
> The exact same issues apply when an IOS bug is found, or an NTP bug, or.....
>
> (And if you think Sendmail didn't do a good job of releasing the info, I
> shudder to think of what you thought of how Cisco handled the whole Lynn thing ;)
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:59:20 CST, Gadi Evron said:
> > Oh, sorry for not mentioning earlier -
> > Operators that want to patch Sendmail, I'd suggest doing it soon. Now we
> > not only do we face risk to our mail servers, but rather trusting other
> > servers as well.
>
> Been there, done that. All the same issues we saw when 8.12.9 came out:
Exactly. You just made my point.
>
> 8.12.9/8.12.9 2003/03/29
> SECURITY: Fix a buffer overflow in address parsing due to
> a char to int conversion problem which is potentially
> remotely exploitable. Problem found by Michal Zalewski.
> Note: an MTA that is not patched might be vulnerable to
> data that it receives from untrusted sources, which
> includes DNS.
>
> So just like last time - I'm sure somebody will patch their external-facing
> mailserver *first*, and that lets exploit mail get through the external
> mailer and reach the internal mailserver (where before it would just have
> 0wned the external server).
>
> Not that Sendmail is any different from any OTHER infrastructure software.
> The exact same issues apply when an IOS bug is found, or an NTP bug, or.....
>
> (And if you think Sendmail didn't do a good job of releasing the info, I
> shudder to think of what you thought of how Cisco handled the whole Lynn thing ;)
>
>
>
[ reply ]