Eric Allman wrote:
>> I know the guy who exploited it. He's better than you think he is.
>
>
> I'm sorry, I was not trying to imply in any way that Mark was blowing
> smoke. I believe he can do it. Take my statement literally: /we/ don't
> /see/ how it can be practical. Perhaps I should have said "understand"
> instead of "see". The point was that this is not a trivial problem to
> exploit. But yes, I do believe it is real, and I think (hope) I made
> that clear in my message.

2 public exploits and counting.

Gadi.

[ reply ]