BugTraq
Re: On classifying attacks Jul 28 2005 07:26PM
Daniel Weber (djweber alum mit edu) (3 replies)
Re: On classifying attacks Mar 26 2006 02:09AM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (1 replies)
Re: On classifying attacks Mar 29 2006 01:19PM
David M Chess (chess us ibm com) (1 replies)
Re: On classifying attacks Mar 30 2006 08:11PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (1 replies)
Re: On classifying attacks Apr 01 2006 11:46AM
john mullee (jmullee yahoo com)

--- Gadi Evron <ge (at) linuxbox (dot) org [email concealed]> wrote:

> David M Chess wrote:
> > But many of us *love* to argue about taxonomies and word meanings (it's
> > cheaper than booze anyway). *8)
> 1. A user-assisted remote attack.
> 2. A client-side remote attack.
>
> I.e., we can add "user assisted" as a class like "local" and "remote",
> or add types (think ICMP here).

> Vulnerability Types [Optional]
> 1. Client-side
> 2. User-assisted

> Questions remain:
> - How does one treat an SQL injection?

I think essentially the problem of trojans, phishes and poisoned data is that of masquerading.

For trojans, the problem is e.g. lack of system-attention key; for Phish, lack of authentication
protocols etc; and for injection, the vulnerability is in the input data scrubbing.

Injection requires a bug in one place: the (web-)application code.

What follows is leveraged hijacking, with perhaps masquerading as an intermediate step.

.02

john

___________________________________________________________
NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/

[ reply ]
Re: On classifying attacks Aug 02 2005 10:39PM
Shwaine (shwaine shwaine com)
Re: On classifying attacks Jul 24 2005 04:31AM
Duncan Simpson (dps simpson demon co uk)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus