|
|
BugTraq
On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity Mar 24 2006 08:01AM Steven M. Christey (coley mitre org) (1 replies) Re: On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity Apr 01 2006 11:00PM Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (3 replies) Re: On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity Apr 03 2006 07:12PM Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (1 replies) Re: On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity Apr 04 2006 07:49AM Javor Ninov (drfrancky securax org) Re: On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity Apr 03 2006 05:19PM Forrest J. Cavalier III (mibsoft mibsoftware com) (1 replies) Re: On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity Apr 04 2006 12:34AM Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) |
|
Privacy Statement |
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 03:00:30PM -0800, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> >
> IMHO the biggest thing that makes Firefox on Linux more secure than IE
> on Windows is that you don't run Firefox as root/administrator, so when
> it gets hacked, it doesn't 0wn the machine.
Actually there is only one major difference: you cannot be rootkited (unless
there is an exploit that fits, and if you are running X11 with all modern
software bells'n'whistles , there probably is) .
From other points of view owning a sole user on the machine does not
differ much.
(Do they still run web browser as administrator? I think XP was designed not
to do that?)
[ reply ]